I have a new column in VegNews magazine, and will be
discussing controversial issues that face vegans. There are actually quite a few (including a
recent blog topic I posted – on whether to speak up or not when others are
eating meat) and I’m bracing myself for a potential onslaught of
criticism. While I’m very excited for
this opportunity, I don’t like having my feelings hurt! But I suppose I’ll consider any tough criticism
a growing experience in the hopes of opening some hearts and minds.
My next topic for the column will be on whether veganism
is just a diet, or is it a philosophy?
Not only is this question controversial, it also will define why many people
do what they do. For example, a person
who is a vegan only in their diet may still wear leather and fur, yet be
calling themselves vegan. This will outrage
many philosophical vegans! Some are
calling for a change in terminology – “vegan” is used for those people who
philosophically believe it’s not right to harm animals for any use, and “plant
based dieters” for those who only eat plant foods, but otherwise don’t worry
about their use of non-food animal products.
And what about those people who say they are vegan, yet
aren’t 100% vegan? They are, for
example, 90% vegan, occasionally eating cheese or even a little meat here and
there. Again, a philosophical vegan
might argue that you can’t be “kind
of” vegan – just like you can’t be “kind of” Christian. You either believe it’s not right to harm
animals or you don’t, and act accordingly.
Semantically, it’s important to some people that these “kind-of” vegans
clarify: “I’m working toward eating a 100% vegan diet, and do so most of the
time.”
It seems rather important how you define veganism. I believe that – even for those of us who
have been vegan for years – this topic can really get you thinking.
What are your thoughts?
Do you think that being a vegan only defines what you eat, or does it
define your approach to life in some way?
I’d love to hear from you!
